Home » Uncategorized » Nuclear Israel : The Balfour Declaration and the Presidential Election as Context

Nuclear Israel : The Balfour Declaration and the Presidential Election as Context

(MEMO: Red font in text below are hyperlinks)

To understand the gravity of what faces the world as a result a Nuclear Israel, we must look to the Balfour Declaration. We must scrutinize its originators, its history, and the personal character of its beneficiaries. With this scrutiny as context, we ask: Can these beneficiaries be trusted? And what are the FULL consequences of misapplying our trust to these Balfour Declaration beneficiaries?    Matters are far more grave then the average “American” realizes, or cares to know.


Before you move on to Discussion, take a moment to put the Balfour Declaration itself in context (Please see Note 1 at-bottom).



But further contextualization begins by listening to an ex-senator from Michigan. When asked a direct, relevant question about a region and topic to which he claims expertise, Senator Carl Levin refuses to ascend to the primary duty of his sworn oath:

Defending the United States of America against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.

In the context of questioning the trustworthiness of Balfour Declaration beneficiaries, Carl Levin, a 36-year member of the United States Senate, while asserting that he is “very straight forward,” but then declaring that he is not a member of the US government?!  The complete Washington Stakeout interviews is here. In case Levin and the sayanim of Congress missed it, many informed people consider the historical and current results of the Balfour Declaration to be . . . questionable.

To glean a representative perspective of Nuclear Israel, note a typical quote by the knucklehead pictured here:


“We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force.” He went on to say “Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.”

Professor Martin Van Creveld of Hebrew University in Jerusalem, said this in 2002, FOUR YEARS BEFORE the Carl Levin clown show in the video above. &nbsp(The Van Creveld interview appeared in the Dutch weekly: Elsevier, 2002, no. 17, p. 52-53, April 27th, 2002).   With this in mind we ask three questions:

(1)  Can we trust senators who declare (when it suits their masters in “israel”) that they are not members of the United States government?
(2)  Can we trust the so-called ally “israel” which has condoned and even promoted the threat verbiage of knuckleheads like Professor Van Creveld who proclaim they would “take the world down with us”;   a jewish threat that has a conscious focus against prominent spiritual centers of Western Christian Civilization?
(3)  Can we trust any person who is aware of these two questions but is so servile and so cowardly that they will not condemn these types of statements and the official US foreign policies that effectively embrace these “israeli” nuclear weapons threats?

(Please see Note 3 at-bottom and the video on political ponerology.)



Pasted below is the Israel National News article of March 25, 2015: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193175#.VRQxUJt0yxA

This rag by Yashar & Wanderman is representative of the inbred, bigoted, agenda-driven dribble that passes for jewish MSM journalism:

US Declassifies Document Revealing Israel’s Nuclear Program

Obama revenge for Netanyahu’s Congress talk? 1987 report on Israel’s top secret nuclear program released in unprecedented move.

By Ari Yashar, Matt Wanderman First Publish: 3/25/2015, 8:00 PM


Dimona nuclear reactor circa 1960s National Security Archive/Flash 90

In a development that has largely been missed by mainstream media, the Pentagon early last month quietly declassified a Department of Defense top-secret document detailing Israel’s nuclear program, a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race, and which the US until now has respected by remaining silent.

But by publishing the declassified document from 1987, the US reportedly breached the silent agreement to keep quiet on Israel’s nuclear powers for the first time ever, detailing the nuclear program in great depth.

The timing of the revelation is highly suspect, given that it came as tensions spiraled out of control between Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and US President Barack Obama ahead of Netanyahu’s March 3 address in Congress, in which he warned against the dangers of Iran’s nuclear program and how the deal being formed on that program leaves the Islamic regime with nuclear breakout capabilities.

Another highly suspicious aspect of the document is that while the Pentagon saw fit to declassify sections on Israel’s sensitive nuclear program, it kept sections on Italy, France, West Germany and other NATO countries classified, with those sections blocked out in the document.

The 386-page report entitled “Critical Technological Assessment in Israel and NATO Nations” gives a detailed description of how Israel advanced its military technology and developed its nuclear infrastructure and research in the 1970s and 1980s.

Israel is “developing the kind of codes which will enable them to make hydrogen bombs. That is, codes which detail fission and fusion processes on a microscopic and macroscopic level,” reveals the report, stating that in the 1980s Israelis were reaching the ability to create bombs considered a thousand times more powerful than atom bombs.

The revelation marks a first in which the US published in a document a description of how Israel attained hydrogen bombs.

The report also notes research laboratories in Israel “are equivalent to our Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Oak Ridge National Laboratories,” the key labs in developing America’s nuclear arsenal.

Israel’s nuclear infrastructure is “an almost exact parallel of the capability currently existing at our National Laboratories,” it adds.

“As far as nuclear technology is concerned the Israelis are roughly where the U.S. was in the fission weapon field in about 1955 to 1960,” the report reveals, noting a time frame just after America tested its first hydrogen bomb.

Institute for Defense Analysis, a federally funded agency operating under the Pentagon, penned the report back in 1987.

Aside from nuclear capabilities, the report revealed Israel at the time had “a totally integrated effort in systems development throughout the nation,” with electronic combat all in one “integrated system, not separated systems for the Army, Navy and Air Force.” It even acknowledged that in some cases, Israeli military technology “is more advanced than in the U.S.”

Declassifying the report comes at a sensitive timing as noted above, and given that the process to have it published was started three years ago, that timing is seen as having been the choice of the American government.

US journalist Grant Smith petitioned to have the report published based on the Freedom of Information Act. Initially the Pentagon took its time answering, leading Smith to sue, and a District Court judge to order the Pentagon to respond to the request.

Smith, who heads the Institute for Research: Middle East Policy, reportedly said he thinks this is the first time the US government has officially confirmed that Israel is a nuclear power, a status that Israel has long been widely known to have despite being undeclared.


In order to support a 2000-year-old agenda, Yashar & Wanderman are compelled to deploy deception, misinformation, and LIES.   Let us take a detailed look:

Item 1    The first sentence is laughable: “In a development that has largely been missed by mainstream media . . .” So, the so-called MSM which is notoriously jewish owned and jewish controlled is not forthright? Geez, who could have guessed? Was the issue of a dishonest news media identified decades ago? Were the public policy implications also specified? If so, how long ago, and by who/whom?

“They talk about press freedom, when in fact all these newspapers have one owner, and the owner is, in any case, the sponsor. This press shapes then public opinion. These political parties do not have any differences at all, like before with us. You already know the old political parties. They were all the same.”     (See https://vimeo.com/144582347)

Characteristically, the jewish owned and jewish controlled MSM has continually slandered the author of that quote as a “mad man.”    But what did that “mad man” say in 1940 about the murderous thuggery that was inflicted upon the peoples of Palestine as a direct result of the Balfour Declaration:

We ask additional questions of the jewish MSM, and its mouthpieces Yashar & Wanderman, in Note 2 – Paragraphs A thru T at-bottom.

Item 2   The Yashar & Wanderman first sentence continues:

(a) document detailing Israel’s nuclear program, a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race.”

Huh? Israel openly declares that they are LIARS, and then they ostensibly say “Trust us!”??   I do not.

So, are we supposed to grovel at the feet of those who openly declare that their ploy for avoiding a nuclear arms race is to lie to everyone on Planet Earth about their decades of . . . possessing nuclear war heads and delivery systems?!

Are we supposed to grovel at the feet of those who openly threaten the use of nuclear weapons, or are we to put them down; and hard!

In any case, any society that tolerates clowns like Yashar & Wanderman who proclaim that lies concealment and deception will avoid “a regional nuclear arms race,” while these same clowns tacitly endorse threats to use their undisclosed nuclear weapons against, is a society in need of extensive psycho-sociological assistance. For those that have an ounce of brains, it is lies that lead to war, not the truth.

Item 3   Their third paragraph is trying to convince you that the release of a TWENTY-EIGHT-YEAR-OLD document was timed by President Obama to coincide with the March 3th rant by Binyamin Netanyahu before the sayanim of Congress. Total nonsense. It is well-known that the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request was not even made by the Obama Administration. It is well-known, but falls into lies-by-omission by Yashar & Wanderman, that the FOIA request was filed THREE YEARS AGO by American reporter Grant Smith. But the crux is, the 386-page document, that has been collecting dust since 1987, is ‘old news.’ And even if it contained something incremental (to whom, I don’t know), President Obama has no control over what’s left of the Judicial portion of American government. President Obama did not release the report. The Pentagon did not release the report per se.   The release was ordered by a judge, not Obama. Yashar & Wanderman are liars.

Item 4   Their fourth paragraph confirms the depth that Tel Aviv lackey reporters will stoop in their incessant effort to deflect and deceive. Look at the list of countries that Yashar & Wanderman are whining about.   Do you see any nation in that short list that has NOT signed the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT)?!   Of course not. They have all signed BUT israel.

Similarly, as the sayanim Congress is fully aware, Iran HAS signed the NPT.   So, are we to assume that this whining is another example of the logic by which Tel Aviv proposes “to avoid a regional nuclear arms race”??  Unlike the other three nations that have not joined the NPT (South Sudan, India, and Pakistan), only israel has deceived the world during several decades. Threats and deception and thuggery connected to nuclear weapons has no excuse among civilized nations; a status that israel has effectively forfeited.

Item 5   Look at their caption below their 1960s outdated and purposely misleading photograph of Dimonia.   If you listen to Tel Aviv they would have you believe that this scene depicts a nice peaceful reactor; a little facility that nobody should be concerned about.  Rubbish!  Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have orders to shoot-to-kill all trespassers. This fact tells what you need to know about Dimonia. Apparently that long-standing reality escaped the incisive reporting of israeli propagandists Yashar and Wanderman.

Juxtapositioned with their lies about Iran, perhaps Tel Aviv would simultaneously claim that Dimonia merely provides electrical power for the Palestinians who need to recharge their cell phones?


A photo of Dimonia taken in early 2014, an illegal nuclear weapons research laboratory

Item 6    The israeli MSM Hype Alleging “Unprecedented”

If the knucklehead Professor Van Creveld of Hebrew University gets his way, a mushroom cloud will be detonated at Vatican City in Rome.

But deployment of the descriptor “unprecedented” hooks its justification to the allegation that this is the first time that a government, specifically the Unites States government, has exposed israeli lies about its possession of nuclear weapons. Indeed this is the same justification deployed by Senator Levin. The servility and lies of other sayan are documented here:

But let us shun the Congressional circus, focusing on the crux of Item 6 with several questions:

Should the people of the United States tolerate israel dictating what the our national government will be allowed to reveal?   And therefore allow them to misdirect the public debate on foreign policy, especially as such relates to our so-called “ally”?   Specifically:

i.    Does so-called israel, unlike any other Middle East nation, possess nuclear weapons, and have they, unlike any other, threatened to use such?

ii.    Have the details of Item i been affirmed previously, and therefore long-known to the sayan of the US Congress?

iii.    Has confirmation of Item i been presented previously to any one else?

iv.    If the answer to Items i, ii, and iii is ‘Yes’, then is the Yashar & Wanderman rant of “unprecedented” not merely hype, but a deadly jewish main-stream-media lie?  A lie of similar ilk that also brought about the horrors of World War Two and September 11, 2001?!



The facts regarding the lies from Nuclear Israel were exposed DECADES ago, making the Yashar & Wanderman rant of “unprecedented” a bold-faced lie, especially since their hype is approved by the israeli governmental branch in Washington.   As the sayan Hillary Rodham demonstrates, the criminal exposure of Nuclear Israel obviates BOTH aspects of the Yashar & Wanderman rant.

A descendant of the demented Cecil Rhodes world view, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is far more than a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO).    Just ask current Democratic presidential candidate, and long-time CFR “outpost” employee Hillary Rodham:


Regarding exposure of the fact that our so-called “ally” has lied to the world for decades about its possession of nuclear weapons, rest-assured that Congress and Hillary are familiar with the reporting of the Karpin brothers, Michael and David:


But confirming that their “unprecedented” rant is a lie, Yashar & Wanderman are also fully aware that David Karpin uploaded this video:

As is well-known, the above video is based on “The Bomb in the Basement – How Israel Went Nuclear and What That Means for the World” (Simon & Schuster, 2006), a book by the same Michael Karpin, another israeli journalist.

For further confirmation that the Yashar & Wanderman “unprecedented” rant is a lie, see:





Referencing Item 4 above, regarding Iran and its membership in the NPT, a treaty that “our ally” israel refuses to join; Iran produced the following video:

But before someone accuses us of being politically biased, with respect to the current American presidential election circus, let us offer a related viewpoint on matters relevant to a Nuclear Israel:


And Binyamin Netanyahu? His behavior relating to these matters shown next (Note: Video is not edited, or speed-ed up . . . this is actual real-time footage):



Note 1

In his 1922 book THE JEWS, Hilaire Belloc qualifies what in-truth comprises so-called “British Blood,” the essence of what enacted the Balfour Declaration:

“With the opening of the 20th century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no jewish blood were the exception.   In nearly all of them the strain was more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still English and the tradition that of purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly jewish and the members of the family were taken for jews whenever they traveled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed this mixture.”


In other words, the Balfour Declaration is not English.

Given that israel has lied for decades about its arsenal of nuclear weapons, and the general history of the Balfour Declaration, what type of behavior should we expect from these (israeli) beneficiaries? That historical behavior is reviewed in the following video; The Vatican should take note:

For review of the Balfour Declaration see “Behind the Balfour Declaration – Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild.”

It should not surprise you that “God’s Chosen” have repeatedly threatened author and Palestine expert Alison Weir:




Note 2

a. Is this the MSM that lied to the world about the events in the Katyn Forrest in 1940?
b. Which MSM has promoted with relentless viciousness the alleged fulfillment of the rabbinical fairy tales that comprise the Shoah?
c. Is this the MSM which refuses to tell the American people the details about the incarceration of Sylvia Stolz?
d. Which MSM told us that it was “Arabs” that bombed and murdered people in the King David Hotel in 1946?
e. Is this the same MSM that declared that the murdering and maiming of hundreds of loyal American military personnel aboard the USS Liberty was an “accident”?
f. Which MSM has NEVER reported on the events of Deir Yassin?
g. Was it the MSM which never reported on the use of ‘white phosphorous’ weaponry against Palestinian civilians in 2008 and 2009?
h. Is this the MSM that never reported on the perspective and plight of Palestinian children that have been murdered or maimed in Gaza?
i. Was it this MSM that somehow missed the the murder of Rachel Corrie in 2003?
j. Are they complaining about the same MSM that never told the truth about the murdering of Thomas Hurndall? (Warning: That link is graphic.)
k. Which MSM told the so-called Allies that Saddam Hussein had ‘weapons of mass destruction’?
l. Is the same MSM which never told us of the cheering and celebrating antics of what has been come to be known as ‘The Dancing Israelis’?

m. Is this the MSM that forgot to tell the world that the same five maggots (discussed in the video above) later sued America for a “breach of civil rights,” but lost?
n. Which MSM never told the American people about the symmetrical free-fall collapse of World Trade Center Building Seven?
o. Which MSM never told the American people that Osama bin Laden was never indicted for ANY aspect of September 11, 2001?
p. Was this the same MSM that failed to report on the GRUESOME details of how 19-year-old Furkan Dogan was murdered in 2010 at the hands of “America’s staunchest ally”?
q. Is the MSM that Yashar & Wanderman are mumbling about, the same one that refuses to detail the level of treason and espionage that is INTRINSIC to a vile, theologically premised hate group called AIPAC?
r. Is this the same MSM that coddles as prime time news anchors the likes of adulterous, fornicating sayanim like Fox News Bill O’Reilly, who openly lies about the events at the 1939 Olympics, slandering the good German people and Gold Medalist Jesse Owens?
s. Is this the same MSM that coddles prime time news anchors such as Fox News Bill O’Reilly who, like Hillary Rodham, promotes that lie that current Russian President Vladimir Putin and former German Chancellor Adolf Hitler are/were motivated by similar goals: Hegemony.   (In case the MSM missed it, Putin and Hitler have/had a common enemy: The Bolshevik/Talmudic jews that murdered the Christian Czar and his entire family in cold blood):

After the murder of the czar, the Bolsheviks then created the most grotesque “experiment” in human social history; the officially atheistic Soviet Union.
t. When the lackeys refer to what the MSM “missed” are they also referring to the glaring fact that it promotes a so-called president that denies the race of his own mother, while basking in the lie that he is “America’s first black president”?


Note 3

The ongoing terrorism and the political ponerologists behind it:

Note 4

The true attitude of “God’s Chosen” toward a man called Jesus, thee central figure in Western Christian Civilization:

Note 5

In this 2016 presidential election year circus, Republican candidate Ted Cruz has made an issue of what he claims are “New York values.”

Sen. Ted Cruz gives a speech in support of Israeli military against Palestine at a pro-Israel rally July 17, 2014 in Washington, D.C. (M. Scott Mahaskey/POLITICO)

Sen. Ted Cruz gives a speech in support of Israeli military against Palestine at a pro-Israel rally July 17, 2014 in Washington, D.C. (M. Scott Mahaskey/POLITICO)

Being a person born and raised in New York, I find the most cowardly aspect of that Cruz outburst to be his sayanim diversion from the true source of his alleged consternation; doing so while holding a Bible in his hand (?!). The following video is just one example of the true source . . . but when was the last time you heard Ted Cruz or ANY of the presidential candidates; let-alone a major leader of the so-called jewish community, denounced the following (typical) behavior as a “hate crime”?

Note 6

Regarding the 2016 presidential election circus and the sponsored MSM reporting of it:

“They talk about press freedom, when in fact all these newspapers have one owner, and the owner is, in any case, the sponsor. This press shapes then public opinion. These political parties do not have any differences at all, like before with us. You already know the old political parties. They were all the same.”
Adolf Hitler 1933

Note 7

So where are we since a jew banker and a store-bought Brit lackey issued the infamous “Balfour Declaration” in behave of the self-proclaimed “God’s Chosen”?

In this first video (not recommended for the faint-of-heart) we see a jew execute an ALLEGEDLY disarmed Palestinian. We say ‘allegedly’ because, implicitly, we cannot trust anything that comes from the lips and minds of political ponerologists. Doubt that connection? In this next video, not only is the Palestinian unarmed, HE’S UNCONSCIOUS AND PROSTRATE ON THE GROUND. The execution takes place at approximately 1:52 . . . the jew soldier with the baseball-styled cap loads the chamber, and fires. Keep your eyes focused on the front fender of the van in the foreground; looking past it to the head of the Palestinian lying unconscious on the ground:

So . . . what was the reaction from the mainstream jew in so-called “israel.” Was it outrage at the blatant murder? Was it a call for due process? Was it a call for justice from “God’s Chosen People”? Watch the next video for an answer to these questions, and the overarching question regarding the Balfour Declaration:

With this video as viral, have ANY of the so-called presidential candidates called on the so-called president for an investigation? Why would they . . . the same “God’s Chosen” that funded the Balfour Declaration are funding the 2016 campaigns . . .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s