(Red font denotes hyperlinks.)
INTRODUCTION – A Pharisaic Pope and the “Separation Barrier”
When was the last time Pope Francis put the zionist state of Israel on-notice regarding their “separation barrier”? You ask, what is a separation barrier? The November 6, 2007 Cornell Chronicle (CC) included an article by sociologist Christine Leuenberger of Cornell University:
Promoting the practice of mealy-mouthing, rather than speaking plainly, the CC reported the following sputum from Leuenberger:
Neutral?! Make no mistake, her intention is diversion and deceit. I emailed Leuenberger and copied many, including Professor Izhak Schnell a social geographer at Tel Aviv University. She never responded. I asked very simple relevant questions, and quoted her from the CC article above:
Leuenberger never responded to my email, or my telephone call. However, I did receive the following response from Professor Schnell (pictured at right):
Academic debate? This 2007 email exchange is available here.
While the vile behavior of Professor Schnell is explainable and expected, it might be more difficult to explain the recent outbursts from Pope Francis, especially for those that lack perspective, context, and rudimentary facts from history. On Wednesday, February 17 2016, Pope Francis directed his comments at presidential candidate Donald Trump regarding the latter’s approach to the ongoing illegal immigration from Mexico. While standing on Mexican soil he said of Trump:
Again: When was the last time Pope Francis put the zionist state of Israel on-notice regarding THEIR “separation barrier”? Let us examine the Pope’s blatant duplicity with perspective, context, and rudimentary facts from recent history.
* * * *
INTRODUCTION – Freemasonry and the Talmudic Infiltration of the Catholic Church
Not discussed by the lackeys of Fox News or CNN or the rest of them, upon the Vatican selection of Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio as Pope Francis, every chapter of the worldwide Freemasonry organization jumped for satanic joy.
From Italy to Argentina to the Philippines, every Freemason rejoiced in what they see as fulfillment of a long-term goal to subvert the Catholic Church into another instrument of their global agenda. And what do brethren such as have to say about Freemasonry? We look to Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise who explained in 1855:
This is consistent with the statement made by the founder of Zionism Theodor Herzl, the so-called Father of the zionist state of “Israel” and their “separation barrier”:
So what are the “final objects of Masonry” and what has a Pharisaic pope have to do with this? The reader should watch the next two videos.
The first describes the efforts of Barbara Spectre to eliminate “separation barriers” everywhere BUT “Israel,” the farce of being “non denominational,” and her threats about the survival of Europe:
The Denis Wise video addresses directly the real “final objects” of Theodor Herzl:
* * * *
Those seeking a direct connection between the agenda stated by Barbara Lerner, and the recent statements made by Pope Francis versus the Donald Trump proposals to address illegal immigration, should read my earlier article ‘The Pharisees of the Vatican.’ Regarding the planned talmudic infiltration of the Catholic Church, I suggest that the reader scroll down in that article to the discussion titled ‘The “School” and the Testimony of Dr. Bella Dodd.’
What must be understood, is that there is no substantive difference between (1) the blatant threats of “multiculturalism” as spewed by Barbara Spectre et al., (2) the grotesque bigotry demonstrated by the zionist “separation barrier” as promoted by Leuenberger and Schnell . . . and the duplicity implicit in the craftily worded attack on Donald Trump by a pharisaic pope. As Jesus said, we must be as wise as the serpent, and in being so we must look behind the smiley masks and discover the true agenda unfolding in the world.
With this in mind, let us now examine two “contributions” that have been called-out by Donald Trump, and are directly connectable to the talmudic/pharisaic agenda: The carnage of September 11, 2001 and the fraud of “weapons of mass destruction” and murdering of 100,000s of innocent Iraqi people in the so-called “Iraq War.”
* * * *
Subject: Donald Trump versus the Pharisees
Two excellent articles have appeared at VeteransToday.com: Dr. Kevin Barrett’s ‘Trump exposing Bush family’s role in 9/11 to ruin Jeb candidacy’ and Richard Edmondson’s ‘Trump Says George W. Bush Lied About Iraq’s WMDs’
Both VT authors mention the “strong words” from “Republican” presidential candidate Donald Trump regarding 9/11 and the Iraq War. The word republican is in quotation marks . . . these Left-Right labels are meaningless, especially when confronting the truth about 9/11 and the Iraq War, as feigned in this CBS News video:
* * * *
Rest assured that all presidential candidates regardless of party affiliation, sayanim-all, will hear at least ‘three crows of the rooster,’ and will never proclaim “strong words” about the modern-day Pharisees, especially these five:
Many thanks to Christopher Bollyn for his original efforts which afforded the true identity of these five who, when arrested, were wearing Arabic garb as part of the False Flag agenda of their native “country.” For review of these five names, watch the excellent 58 second video by the late Anthony Lawson:
* * * *
The effort here includes embellishing the VeteransToday articles by Barrett and Edmondson.
First I fortify the “strong words” with a prosecutorial fact that apparently has escaped Trump and his campaign staff. I left a voice mail in this regard at Trump’s comments line 646-736-1779, and an email at https://www.donaldjtrump.com/contact
My voicemail to Trump responded far more directly to the CBS News video above. My email will challenge the Trump adage about “making good deals,” and more specifically “reaching across the aisle.” I test Trump’s political and personal integrity . . . with information that rejects the implicit servility of the CBS News question (“Should Pres George W Bush have been impeached?”).
My voicemail and email involves the work of the #1 prosecutor in American jurisprudence history, a democrat, the late Vincent Bugliosi:
Please watch the following EIGHT year old Vincent Bugliosi video:
* * * *
Contrary to the mealy-mouth question posed by CBS News, Bush and the entire PNAC tribe need to be prosecuted for MURDER, not merely impeached.
* * * *
Trump is parroting what is well-known about the moral and therefore social deterioration not only since 9/11, but since the time of the jewish Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. The latter, a Jacob-Schiff-funded talmudic horror show, that in primary measure was directed at the Body of Christ, brings us to the second and overriding CONTEXT; a Christian spiritual context that was presented to three children in 1913 in Fatima, Portugal. Those apparitional presentations by Our Lady predicted the current circumstances with an accuracy that can only be sourced as Divine. I detail the events of Fatima in my article ‘The Pharisees of the Vatican.’
It’s quite simple really . . . in the next video Sister Lucia, the surviving child of Fatima, explained in her later years:
* * * *
In regard to my words above, that “Left-Right labels are meaningless, especially when confronting the truth about 9/11 and the Iraq War,” let us also review our deteriorating circumstances as was described with alacrity in the 1920s and 1930s.
A very famous man had long-ago OPENLY declared that the bolsheviks, and their hole called the Soviet Union, was implicitly evil. He was one of only two national leaders that openly fought against that satanic Soviet stench. But in 1931 he also warned us of the mirage and seduction deployed by those who proclaim to be opponents of Marxist socialism; leaders of the so-called “democratic states”:
“In reality, money rules in these countries (“democracies”). They talk about press freedom, when in fact all these newspapers have one owner, and the owner is, in any case, the sponsor. This press shapes then public opinion.
These political parties do not have any differences at all, like before with us. You already know the old political parties. They were all the same.
Then these people must think that especially in these countries (“democracies”) of freedom and wealth; it should exist, a very comfortable life for its people. But the opposite is the case . . . In these countries, in so-called democracies, its people is by no means the main focus of attention.”
The following is a screenshot from the next video:
Please compare that quote to the 1930s quote, “these political parties do not have any differences at all.” The excellent video by Denis Wise:
* * * *
Conclusion 1: No More Bushes
Let us assist Trump’s recent foray into 9/11 and the later conflagrations (that the former allegedly justified in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere) as well as his foray into the fairy tales about WMDs spun by Bush and the PNAC tribe. Above all, let us ensure that anyone named Bush never gets to orchestrate anything, let-alone attend grammar school reading class demonstrations in Florida:
Conclusion 2: Proposal to Revise Sky-scrapper Building Materials
Most, especially the Corporate Counsel of my alma mater, would like to forget about Elliot “Skull Cap George” Spitzer. But since Trump has brought up the subject of 9/11, let us review Spitzer’s overarching “contribution” to that event:
In 2005 Donald Trump refers to Larry “Pull it!” Silverstein as “a good guy, a friend of mine.”
* * * *
You will also hear Trump innuendos that imply that he is an expert in heavy construction technologies. This is fortuitous since he can advise the architectural and civil engineering fields on the latest building materials. One of the most important additions to those selections involved the prove-out of the indestructibility of paper passports (limited to those with the names and faces of Arabic persons).
The viability of the revised building materials proposal was apparently approved by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks, aka The 9/11 Commission Report. Approval comes from brethren 9/11 Commission Executive Director Philip Zelikow. Of the indestructible Arabic passports let us focus on that allegedly owned by Satam al Suqami, one of the alleged suicide hijackers that was allegedly aboard Flight 11. The demise of what was alleged to be Flight 11 (a 110 ton 10,000 gallon fueled Boeing 767 airliner) on the morning of September 11, 2001 is pictured here:
At the 9/11 Commission of Monday, 26 January 2004, Co-chairman Thomas Kean announced that the hearing will focus on a subject near-n-dear to the heart of Donald Trump: border security. Zelikow introduces his first witness, brethren Susan Ginsburg:
Zelikow: “Members of the Commission, working with you we (Zelikow’s staff) have developed initial findings on how the individuals who carried out the 9/11 attacks entered the US . . . terrorists of certain nationalities must obtain a document permitting them to visit, a visa. Finally, the terrorist must actually enter the country and keep from getting detained or deported by immigration or other law enforcement officials. Susan Ginsburg, senior counsel to the Commission will begin by examining how the hijackers navigated these stages.”
Ginsburg: “Beginning with passports. Four of the hijacker’s passports have survived in whole or in part. Two were recovered from the crash site of United Airlines flight 93 in Pennsylvania. These are the passports of Ziad Jarrah and Saeed al Ghamdi. One belonged to a hijacker on American Airlines flight 11. This is the passport of Satam al Suqami. A passerby picked it up and gave it to a New York Police Department detective shortly before the World Trade Center towers collapsed . . . ”
The passport that was located at the center of the huge “Flight 11” fireball pictured above, the paper passport of alleged hijacker of Satam al Suqami, the paper passport that “a passerby picked it up and gave it to a New York Police Department detective shortly before the World Trade Center towers collapsed” . . . was later submitted without objection as Government Exhibit WT00001 at the trial of the alleged “20th hijacker” (Zacarias Moussaoui, whose person and laptop had been in FBI custody since August 2001):
Therefore, rather than complaining about its aesthetics Trump should have advised Larry Silverstein to specify Arabic paper passport materials for the construction of the “Freedom Tower” . . . since these Arabic materials are apparently indestructible.
Trump should be advised to use Arabic paper passport material for construction of his next project, the border wall between the United States and Mexico.
Conclusion 3: Donald Trump Meets Vincent Bugliosi
If Trump is going to make claims about a history of “reaching across the aisle” then as president he can certainly reach for the book by the democrat Vincent Bugliosi, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.
* * * *
Conclusion 4: Donald Trump Needs to Read: Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil
As a premier on this December 2015 book written by Gerard Menuhin, son of world famous violinist Yehudi Menuhin, the author quotes Joseph Sobran on page 317:
“An ‘anti-semite’ used to mean a person that hated jews.
Now it means a man that is hated by jews!”
A detail that Pope Francis, and professors Leuenberger and Schnell, wants you to forget is that the most despicable examples of physical apartheid walls include: The Berlin Wall built by the Bolsheviks, and now the West Bank wall built by the Zionists. Merely bringing up that historical reality results in being “hatered,” exactly as the Sobran quote predicts (See email sent by Professor Izhak Schnell quoted in Introduction above.).
If instead of exposing his “multicultural” agenda, one implicit in his rant against Donald Trump, the Pope had made pragmatic suggestions relating to border security and most relevantly the right of the citizens of the United States to protect their national sovereignty, then this Pope would have “built bridges.”